层被从注册表的容器images are `.tar.gz` and MikroTik unpacks them.download directory as .tar.gz and to upload (and unpack) .tar.gz archive.
层被从注册表的容器images are `.tar.gz` and MikroTik unpacks them.download directory as .tar.gz and to upload (and unpack) .tar.gz archive.
In docs is written that this is ufl, but only for third chain of 2GHz and 5GHz.Does anyone know if the replaceable antenna is ufl or mmcx? It's hard to see from the photos.
I'm curious what is the AC+NAT performance :) I'll test it tomorrow. My hAP AC will arrive :)Nice results from users on social media:
https://twitter.com/darkmanlv/status/702448475196276737
I got one, and I got a couple of Routerboards too. I can just argue that for SOHO OpenWrt is simply better, and extra RouterOS (like broken OpenVPN) features doesn't justify buying this device at this price.then just go for tp-link
You can always try OpenWrt. It works great.Right now I have had to use MTIK boxes to create TCP OpenVPN Tunnels to a PFSense box at the HQ for a network because I could not find a suitable router that would run PFSense in a small package for the price point MTik offers.
Is possible as long as you have physical access to the device and you can "netinstall" the device.For SXT though, I don't think you can dismount the HDD, and as such, that's not really possible anyway.
Is possible and works, but not in Metarouter. Metarouter doesn't support usb-passthrough.Unfortunately Openwrt not add printer support, using usb printer with OpenWRT not possible now.
Then install OpenWrt :) You'll have printer support.+1
On RB951 "home router" it should be one of the main feature...
If you look at used CPU it is old :)RPi is not 'old', but it is cheap.
In the more generic sense, ARM chipsets could be a good addition for a number of different platforms. RPi is just the first example that came to mind.
What we really need is to have dual-radio SOHO router. I didn't have in years to change once setup wireless.We need it for HOME AP wifi
Maybe not, but what bothers to have SSL anyway.do you think there is anyone to do cost for sniffing information like these? what is the reason behind this hack?! :shock:
https://launchpad.net/~seriy-pr/+archiv ... nager-l2tp> Ubuntu/Mint
NM in ubuntu lacks L2TP/IPsec support.
Yes, but it takes an unusually long time. Especially when I had to replace my home RB951G with TL-WDR4300 and switch to OpenWrt (i don't want to have two devices working).Surely its only a matter of timeDo you plan to release SOHO like router (RB951G) with dual-band wireless?
Use the Proxmox VE. Is Open Source Virtualization Platform with support for almost everything what is needed ;) And it support OpenVZ and KVM and plays very nice with MikroTik.IManaging the KVM devices is really unpleasant in our environment.
Use ISO to install on guest system. It is just easy as install on PC.Could you tell me where i can get images for either of these please? Is there anywhere to install VMtools on the VM?
I can make it for you later. What configuration?anyone has a benchmark of RB1100AH (no IPSec acceleration) IPSEC tunnel thruput?
i would be interested to compare against older (prototype) RB1100AH (with IPSec) - I could make ~400mbps with it.
There was problem with DHCP server on disconnected/disabled interfaces. Ask support and you will get 5.8 prerelase.5.7 on 493G is having CPU issues when hotspot server is setup. DHCP takes %40 CPU and overall is reaching %100 all the time.
Can You describe why? I have been using 5.x for few months without many major issues.Please improve the quality of RouterOS he is very unstable in all aspects.
Yes. I'm exactly talking about virtio. Show us from virtualized RouterOS:I try to use "virtio" (not RTL8139) to have gigabit ethernet, but is the same CPU usage.
Is a mistake to use vlan?
release date?RB751G
RB1100AHx2
Yes, you are right, because E8400 doesn't support hardware wirtualization (VT-x). Change CPU to VT-x capable and KVM will work.Hi,
KVM isnt work with Intel E8400 cpu.
I did test it a minute ago and it doesn't work. Neither with nat-t enabled nor disabled ;)Yep. From my laptop behind NAT.
Did you try behind NAT?I just tried it with a PSK and it worked on my Win7 laptop., Dunno about WinXP. But that is a step in the right direction. Gotta try it with multiple clients/certificates next.
because of new device: RB493G.there's also a firmware upgrade ... at least in the mipsbe
md5, des.I'm suprised, your screenshot shows RB750.
What is your IPSec and Ethernet ports config?
That is not a problem. The time when I made screenshot, through router was going heavy ipsec (15Mbps) traffic :)It shows your CPU usage is %100
maybe it is the causes
plz retry after reboot
You will? Oh sh*t ;) ETA?EoIP works only between two MikroTik routers.
When we add support for pure GRE, then you will be able to make this.
Only with n. It was pointed by MikroTik some time ago.@ayufan: Is it broken only with n cards, or the cost of using it is always that high, no matter what type of cards you use? And, why is the cost so gigh, how does it work, that it is that ineffective?
Fixed. Try now.the source of class has 404 (not found). Where i can find this php class?
M.
any ETA? i would like to buy too :)working on itIf I could get a wireless RB750 for less than $100 US, I would probably end up buying 10 or 12 a year, just in my little corner of the world.
Most probably they won't add support for pure GRE, because it will confilct with current implementation of EoIP.After fighting more interconnections with GGSN's I had to revert to another CISCO (damn)....
Guys, GRE support (as in direct GRE tunnel compatible with Cisco) would be a life saver....
Exactly and it is very dissapointing, because there is none properly implemented and fast remote access solution on RouterOS.My preference would be IPSEC/L2TP and that was my plan all along, but it never worked properly in ROS.
I've written to support about that bug long time ago. Most likely it will not be fixed in any near future. In fact it makes L2TP useless - I had to switch L2TP+IPsec to Windows Server and works without any problem.Hope it will get fixed soon.
Is there a new version with webfig fixed? :0yes, the webfig has an issue, we fixed it in the next build.
did not forget ;)don't forget that ending slash. works for me in same browser
I'm pretty sure that I did ;)did you install it :D ?
I do have that same problem when client has public IP it works like charm but when client is not it's stuck in trying to connect to L2TP server.michalciza2, are you able to establish the connect, when host is not behind the NAT?
one process can use many cores with many threads, but one thread can use only oneOne process can use only one core
Nice one :) It's not important, because he was in "main" menu.I think you forgot the '/'
maybe not simply route, but redirect using dstnat rule ;)is it possible to route broadcast packets?.. O_o
boot-device=if-reset-push-boot-from-ethernet
how? with reset button?Yes, you will be able to use netinstall.
:set kb 1000 :set Mb ($kb*$kb) :set Gb ($Mb*$kb) :if ($traf>(100*$Gb)) do={}
not when you use:also you may try to use RouterOS API - it's easier than parse SSH output =)
:put [/ interface print as-value]