..... First, I want to remove wlan2 from the bridge, but see no method .....
..... First, I want to remove wlan2 from the bridge, but see no method .....
MBP:~ $ nslookup -q=NS mynetname.net 8.8.8.8 Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 ** server can't find mynetname.net: NXDOMAIN
Screenshot from the device (iPhone 6S) has been added.
Uhh huh... And what was the actually reporting throughput at the device?
V7 released ?? Where can I get it ?Enterprises cannot rely on "beta" software and tons of unfullfilled promises of eveyrhing will be fixed in v7 (which got released without a routing package
Have you seen the video posted above ? No cabling there at all.Cabling also adds Voltage drop
and server's IP address 192.168.100.2 in logs does not compute."The server is at a public, addressable IP, not behind a NAT. "
Set it torequired.its use is indicated in the profile?
hEX, if it's RB750Gr3, should be capable of 65 Mbps IPIP/IPsec as it has IPsec hardware offload, wAP is not.note2: site 1 is hex and site 2 wAP, I know they are not perfect ..
It was hEX (RB750Gr3) which has the same MTK chipset as hEX S; it's essentially hEX S without SFP and PoE out.Wow - you reach 1 Gbit.
Do you have the same hardware? hex S?
These are pretty good numbers for IPsec single client / TCP, I've seen similar performance on RB750Gr3, which is pretty close to hAP ac2 in IPsec perf, in my quick tests.However, even after you have applied the steps you used, the speed is still around 230Mbps.
Looks like you're testing single core performance of a hAP ac2 by single threaded b-test here.In the attachment I am sending screen of devices between which I am doing the test.
You can setonly-one=yesin PPP Profile for that user to prevent second connection.same problem with l2tp server binding.
running v6.44.2
I guess I should not count on this feature then.
:foreach i in=[/interface find actual-mtu=1480 running] do={/ip address print where interface=[/interface get value-name=name $i]}
Have you used RoS wi-fi tools (spectral-history, frequency-monitor) to find less busy channel(s) ?I tried different configurations with Tx\Rx power, different band types and frequency.
It's not the same range. If you look at the route that PPPoE client adds, you won't see a netmask.Hi,
As shown in the figure below (the blue line), I can't access from one to another router in the same range of IP's.
That's the way it works - you add several IPs by one and then have a single address list with multiple single IPs and use it in filter rules.So I had to add each ip one by one into allowed-bit .
It's not a bug it's a featureI think there is a Bug that wasn't in 6.42.12:
Running that command on 6.42.12 works:Code:Select all:log info ([/interface pppoe-client monitor pppoe-WAN as-value]->"status")