this problem was already in 7.8beta, why not fix it in 7.9beta?not "containers", but particular ones imported that are OCI schema based. This is due to change in dockerhub.
Multiple workarounds are already posted in forums, proper "fix" will come with nextbetaversion.
On 5009 the same problem.Yes it's a problem with CHR instances, but with actual routers you SHOULD NOT run containers on their internal memory, as if the warning on the documentation page isn't enough.
You are not the only one having this problem. I already write about every release about it.So I'm not too sure why I seem to be the only person still experiencing this issue.
so try on the internal flash drive. you will also get an error.Of course, yes.where is your data stored? on an external flash drive?
it's a usb flash drive??And, as I said before, it is working great on my RB5009UG+S+ using the configuration I shown.
this postviewtopic.php?p=955911#p955095Why are you creating duplicated, nested mounts for/opt/adguardhome/workand for/opt/adguardhome/work/data? This might be your problem.
in v7 also doesn't work. when will there be a fix?Multiple clients behind NAT is fixed in ROSv7. It is not possible to implement this fix in ROSv6.
using an existing container.Did you create a NEW container or what this your already existing Adguard container that you simply started after the upgrade to RC1 ???
fixed!Nice, is the sudo bug fixed?viewtopic.php?t=178342#p940376
i set varsset environmental variables as per docs DNSMASQ_USER should be root
are simple queues set up?RB4011iGS+ updated from 7.1beta3 to 7.1beta4 with no problems.
/queue simple add max-limit=30M/30M name=All_30Mbit queue=pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=192.168.0.0/24