router marking is not working in v7. Can you confirm it?Config is changed in v7Code:Select all/routing table add fib name=xx vrf=main /ip route add dst-address=8.8.8.8^xx gateway=10.155.101.1@main /ip route rule add dst-address=1.1.1.1 action=lookup table=xx
what I was comparing tests on routerboard.com rb2011 is in many ways at least 2x more powerfull than rb750r2I don't think so.
Try another firmware, lik 6.19 and also with wirelles-fp enabled..and give us know....Still having issues on this with V6.27 I have links that used to run at 75 meg not barely getting 30. But on UDP i can test at 100. Is their any way to fine tune NV2 as i can not find anything.
Yes this would be ubnt killer. And now 941 is mainly tplink killer!!!mikrotik please introduce some sxt like product with smips 5ghz and dual chain
limit features just to basic cpe
at approx $35 price that will make life of wisp easier
thanks
I am telling you again: celeron is not quadcore but dualcore, and not 2ghz but 1,8ghz...so read at first and then comment...you said clearly in title that is a comparison.
Read in your link what hardware was used.
it is plastic....Rf elements have a good aluminium box that fit onto airmax sectors. Inside you can put a RB7xx or RB91x. It's calles station box S
no it is celeron 1,8ghz dual core....Comparison is made between a dual core Atom at 1.8Ghz and quad core Celeron at 2Ghz.
I can say for sure that an Lamborghini is faster than a truck.
what kind? ospf, eoip(what mode of balancing balance-rr, xor..)? which is best for 2 wireless nv2 linkssureDoes anybody have active working bonding?
but till now none of this is so rock solid as DUAL NSTREME..also in noisy enviroment....dual nstreme is like one existent but abandoned technology on favour to 802.11n, MIMO and nv2