The target scope must be larger than the scope of the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. Set at least to 11

Thetarget scopemust be larger than thescopeof the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. Set at least to 11

dst:host, gw:connected_gateway, scope=11, target-scope=10 dst:subnet, gw:host, scope=30, target-scope=11

Why do I need a Target-Scope of 12 for the first route, when the second/all other have a scope of 10?!
Why is 11 not enough but its enough for the second route? I mean 11 is even less than 10 ("not lessorequal")?

Thetarget scopemust be larger than thescopeof the route over which you want to resolve the gateway. Set at least to 11

From what I can see,target-scopeof recursive route must be greater thantarget-scopeof resolving route. Because:
1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger);
2) it works in the following case:

Code:Select all

dst:host, gw:connected_gateway, scope=11, target-scope=10 dst:subnet, gw:host, scope=30, target-scope=11

Here, the target-scope of the second route (11) isnotlarger than the scope of the route over which it's resolved (11 also). But if you change target-scope of the first route to 11 - the second route stops being resolved (as itstarget-scopeis now not greater thantarget-scope的第一个路线)

Chupaka, I believe what you meant to say is that the TARGET SCOPE of the resolving route must be one greater than the SCOPE of the recursive route.

1).Target Scope must be greateror equal toScope,as it has always been.
2).Target Scope should decrease on each step of recursion (new in RouterOS v7)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3) Scope of next route should be not more than target-scope of your route (can be equal or less);
4) Target-scope of next route should be strictly less than target-scope of your route (this one was introduced in ROS v7);